Steel, I think we need to figure out who is actually willing to continue doing the QC checks before we continue with this system. If we don't have enough people, then we're going to need to come up with another system. And by enough people, I mean people who are actually active, knowledgeable, and willing to dedicate the time to checking each analysis.
Quarreling with Palkias..
Ok, so we basically want to find out who is actually willing to QC check analyses, both new and old, and if the system can still work. I know that me and you, SilentDreams, can still do that to a degree, but I'm not sure about the others. Obviously, some people like Wilson, Lovat, and Dimes probably won't do that now, so again, we need to figure this out.
I also posted another place to just post analyses for sets, and they could be used in later analyses.
Yeah I'm just going to go through the grammar on every analysis before deeming it finished, just to be safe. No sense in putting together a grammar team since I have the spare time to do it myself. That way we won't run into our previous problem of people just plain not doing the checks anymore. What we really need is people who are good with content. Preferably people who battle a lot, test sets out, know what works and what doesn't and why, etc.
That's a good idea on the post about the sets. Hopefully people will be willing to post them so we can get more of the analyses completed.
Suggestion. Have sign ups for new analyzers. Even the current ones have to register for this. So that way we can pick out the active and skilled and also rank out the people who need to test more.
Originally Posted by SilentDreams
The ORIGINAL purple username member of TU
No. 1 Honor Student
Made a mistake. Can someone check my Sableye analysis please? Didn't know that this thread exists.
© PokéStation 2007-2012. All Rights Reserved. Pokémon and related characters are ©1995-2012 Nintendo
. All other copyrights go to the original creators or owners.